tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post4092203439408166276..comments2024-01-02T10:55:10.607-06:00Comments on Angry Astronomer: ITT: I disprove the second law of thermodynamicsJon Voiseyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11550625188837528980noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-44553497775549514152013-03-03T11:20:12.497-06:002013-03-03T11:20:12.497-06:00thermodynamics, all systems have "loss', ...thermodynamics, all systems have "loss', right. I have one word that disproves that notion; seeds.DAVID Chttp://pulse.yahoo.com/_N6XFOMPCQ4NPNZJ6YI5LGTVJPEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-77472878469447855152012-12-22T21:17:48.338-06:002012-12-22T21:17:48.338-06:00Science? That thing created by man which is flawed...Science? That thing created by man which is flawed? There are MANY things science will NEVER prove or explain. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-51396896787850532022012-05-17T14:34:01.170-05:002012-05-17T14:34:01.170-05:00Quite funny that energy by itself will not increas...Quite funny that energy by itself will not increase information - and that is what evolution is about, is it not? Starts from a single cell (very complicated item) and then somehow through random, non- directional "mutation"(which is in almost all cases detrimental, and never goes beyond certain limits - ask your local farmer-) develops into something fully functioning without any transitional forms in the fossil record (not referring to the proven hoaxes or manufactured "evidence" (the English word "lies/liar" ring a bell?). Despite the latest technology used and countless efforts, life from non-living material has never occurred - they had to use parts of a living cell.<br />And you guys believe such balderdash?Exodus771noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-71585179303832970302011-11-21T17:40:07.929-06:002011-11-21T17:40:07.929-06:00Always amusing how they think it disproves evoluti...Always amusing how they think it disproves evolution when it doesn't. And even if it did, how exactly do they justify that it proves Genesis and Creationism? It's a flawed argument that shows they haven't got a clue about science.Barry Evanshttp://twitter.com/bazblackaddernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-10181045045001350372011-05-10T18:21:28.428-05:002011-05-10T18:21:28.428-05:00Another example is the operation of a common house...Another example is the operation of a common household refrigerator. The Second Law of Thermodynamics implies that energy can never <i>spontaneously</i> flow from an area of low heat to an area of higher heat, yet the refrigerator continues to work. When the Standard Creationist Troll can explain to me how the refrigerator doesn't actually violate thermodynamics, but that biological evolution does, well, I'll be impressed.Mike Crichtonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25327006.post-80784581060794808382008-07-31T08:33:00.000-05:002008-07-31T08:33:00.000-05:00Another example is the operation of a common house...Another example is the operation of a common household refrigerator. The Second Law of Thermodynamics implies that energy can never <I>spontaneously</I> flow from an area of low heat to an area of higher heat, yet the refrigerator continues to work. When the Standard Creationist Troll can explain to me how the refrigerator doesn't actually violate thermodynamics, but that biological evolution does, well, I'll be impressed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com